Intelligence requirement workbench
Analysts ask questions. Requirements orchestrate collection, evidence, models, and resulting intelligence objects — not only reactive alerts.
ir-nikoi-sourceIN_PROGRESS
What evidence supports or refutes POLARIS as a potential source of the 29 April 2025 marine anomaly?
Collection plan
- · Retain AIS correlation claims from source materials
- · Seek multi-provider AIS validation (future)
- · Seek spectral / chemistry confirmation (future)
- · Enumerate alternative vessel hypotheses
Models
- · mod-candidate-vessel
Resulting objects
- · nikoi-2025-04-29
- · candidate-polaris
Causal attribution must remain separate from association score.
ir-location-disagreementSATISFIED
How should competing location / EEZ claims for the Nikoi case be represented to analysts?
Collection plan
- · Surface Source A vs Source B claims
- · Mark SYSTEM STATUS: SOURCE CLAIMS DIFFER
Models
- —
Resulting objects
- · ev-eez-claim
- · ev-location-claim-a
Disagreement is provenance functioning correctly.
ir-smeir-7dBLOCKED
Which high-confidence environmental events have occurred within the SMEIR during the last seven days?
Collection plan
- · Requires live observation adapters
- · Phase 1 uses historical replay only
Models
- · mod-singapore-nexus
Resulting objects
- —
Architected; not live in Phase 1.
Example future requirements
- Which sediment plumes may be associated with recent land disturbance?
- Which vessels scheduled for Singapore interaction have unresolved marine-environmental intelligence?
- What environmental changes outside Singapore are physically capable of affecting Singapore waters over the next 72 hours?
ARCHITECTED_NOT_BUILT